Feature/
Activity/
Process
WILDLIFE
|
Benefit
and any disbenefit |
To which
people/stake
holders? |
How to
realise? |
How to
make it pay? |
Other issues
eg:
Scale
(local/reg/national/global)
Trends
Timescales |
|
Focus on ecological processes |
Demonstrates how nature is open to the unexpected
Reluctance to accept chaos
Less control
Cheaper
Fewer jobs?
Diversity may decrease |
Wildlife benefits
Flood and carbon management benefits
Farmers could lose or benefit
Contractors lose |
Grant structures
Acquiring land
Land ownership pooled to work at
landscape level.
Revise BAP framework |
Revision of grant structures
To pay for wider public benefits of land
management
Eco-tourism |
Build into CAP reform & RDP
Timescale: 2013
Climate change driving reform |
|
More extensive and restricted grazing
|
Less fertilizer
Less ivomectin sheep dip
Increase scrub/woodland
Viability of agriculture
Loss of grassland
Biodiversity
Loss of amenity? |
Farmers
Wildlife
Taxpayers |
Inevitable due to CAP reform
Support for natural grazing regimes
Demonstration projects |
Value-added food & meat
(organic and rare breeds)
Conservation charities paying for it
Grant structures |
Animal welfare
Public acceptance
Public risk
Managing transition for local people |
|
Reintroduction of eg. lynx |
Control herbivore populations
Charismatic megafauna
Step change
Branding
Sheep
Public perception |
Visitor income from lynx economy |
Authorised reintroduction programme
Unauthorised – eg. as in Scotland and in
SW England |
Pay for any sheep losses
Eco-tourism |
Defra
Animal welfare
Scale – need woodland
100% in favour |
